51st ANNUAL INSTITUTE

Special Institute Presentation
Monday, March 5, 9:30 A.M.-5:00 P.M.
Registration Form

Who’s Crazy Here?: The Slippery Slope in the

Therapeutic Moment


Instructor:

Anne Alonso, Ph.D., CGP, DFAGPA


In the difficult work of joining with and responding to our patients' distress we can overlook our own vulnerabilities. Now that we have come to understand that the co-created transferences in our groups are influenced by personal neurotic conflicts as well as global conflicts and the natural disasters we all live with, it is incumbent to care for all the parties in the clinical moment. None of us is immune to these stresses. Thus we may find ourselves with "crazy" fantasies that can, if we are not careful, spill into the work to the detriment of our patients.

The goal of this Institute is to encourage a dialogue among the participants relating to the clinical potential for “slipping and sliding” that is always a challenge. To do this, we will view film clips from popular films, such as What About Bob? and Analyze This as stimuli for our conversation.

This session will be presented two formats. In the morning, participants will be seated in groups of 12 with a facilitator/scribe. Several film vignettes will be shown as stimuli. After each clip, the small groups, aided by talking points, will discuss the vignettes. After each of two such, a member from each group will summarize the conversation in his/her small group and then report back to the Large group. In the afternoon, Dr. Alonso will conduct an observed group with volunteers from the audience, leaving ample time for questions, reflections, and hopefully, greater clarity about ways to find ourselves renewed and ready to scale the slopes once again with greater equanimity!

Dr. Anne Alonso is a Clinical Professor in the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School and Director of the Center for Psychoanalytic Studies at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. She is a past president of the American Group Psychotherapy Association and past chair of the Group Psychotherapy Foundation. Dr. Alonso is also a Distinguished Fellow of the AGPA, a Fellow of the American Psychological Association and recipient of the Best Group Psychologist from that organization. She was awarded the prestigious Clifford Barger award for Mentoring from Harvard Medical School. She is professor emerita from the Fielding Graduate School of Psychology. Dr. Alonso has published prolifically in the field on dynamic theory and therapy, and serves on several editorial boards. She has authored two books and over 50 refereed articles, chapters and reviews.

Continuing Education for Special Institute Presentation: 5.5 credits/.55 units


Two-Day Institute Sections
Tuesday & Wednesday, March 6-7
Registration Form

INSTITUTE OPENING SESSION
Tuesday, March 6, 8:30-9:15 A.M.

Finding Yourself in the Group

 

David Hawkins, M.D., CGP, DFAGPA

We all live, work, grow up and find/form our identities in groups.  What better place could there be than a group, then, in which to come to know ourselves better?  In an AGPA Institute Psychodynamic Process Group we spend two days learning how a group goes through its developmental trajectory.  We watch the leader, or leaders, assist the group in creating a safe environment and developing useful working norms.  We also have a remarkable opportunity to meet unfamiliar parts of ourselves that are stirred in our internal experience or are reflected to us by other group members.

Dr. David Hawkins, is a psychiatrist in private practice in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. He conducts training groups in psychodynamic group psychotherapy in Atlanta and Chapel Hill and lectures nationally on group psychotherapy. He is a past president of the American Academy of Psychotherapists and a past president and Distinguished Fellow of the American Group Psychotherapy Association. His particular interest is the ongoing exploration of the leader's self that is stimulated by working with psychotherapy groups.


The Institute is scheduled over two full days: Tuesday, March 6, 9:30 A.M. – 6:00 P.M. and Wednesday, March 7, 8:15 A.M. - 5:30 P.M. Registration will only be accepted for the full two-days and registrants will be expected to attend both days for the entire time. Continuing Education credit will not be awarded for partial attendance. Devoted to small group teaching, these two-day groups are led by experienced instructors and are formed according to participants' levels of experience. The Institute consists of two sections:

  • Process Group Experience (PGE) Sections:  
    These small groups provide participants an environment to obtain, expand and retain their skills in conducting group therapy.  The PGE sections are divided into three levels, giving participants an opportunity to work with peers who have similar levels of experience.  The PGE sections are conducted by many of the country's outstanding group therapists.  The group psychotherapy skills gained are important in conducting any group, regardless of its theoretical orientation, time parameter or patient population.  PGE sections are essential training for all professionals who work with groups.  A portion of each PGE will be didactic. A maximum of twelve registrants will be accepted per group.

  • Specific Interest Sections:  
    Intensive learning that explores a variety of theories and methods in group treatment is offered in these limited registration groups.  Registrants will pursue current interests in greater depth or learn ways of integrating new approaches and methods into their private practice, clinic or agency work. Many of the Specific Interest Sections have experiential components. Registration maximum has been set by each instructor.

Continuing Education for Two-Day Institute Sections: 14.0 credits/1.4 units 

EVALUATION, RESEARCH AND OBSERVATION: Institute sections will be observed by Institute Subcommittee members. Some events have been selected for research projects approved and conducted under the auspices of the Association.  In addition all registrants will be asked to complete questionnaires, designed to aid us in continuing to provide high quality meetings, upon conclusion of their attendance at events. The last few minutes of each event will be utilized for completion of questionnaires.

PROCESS GROUP EXPERIENCE (PGE) SECTIONS

I-A. GENERAL PROCESS GROUP EXPERIENCE

Entry Level
0-4 years of group psychotherapy experience

Instructors:
1.    Josephine Cunningham Tervalon, LCSW, CGP, FAGPA, Private Practice, Houston, Texas
2.    John Caffaro, Ph.D., Professor, California School of Professional Psychology, Los Angeles, California
3.    Joshua Gross, Ph.D., CGP, ABPP, FAGPA, Psychologist and Group Psychotherapy Coordinator, University Counseling Center, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida
4.    Janice Morris, Ph.D., CGP, Private Practice, Austin, Texas
5.    Robert Evans Schulte, M.S.W., CGP, Private Practice, Alexandria, Virginia
6.    Joan-Dianne Smith, M.S.W., RSW, FCGPA, Private Practice, Winnipeg, Manitoba,Canada

Intermediate Level
4-9 years of group psychotherapy experience

Instructors: 

7.    Russell Hopfenberg, Ph.D., CGP, Private Practice, Raleigh, North Carolina

8.    Saul Hopper, Ph.D., CGP, Private Practice, Fort Collins, Colorado

9.    Lise Motherwell, Psy.D., Ph.D., CGP, FAGPA, Faculty, Center for Psychoanalytic

Studies, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

10.  Judith Schaer, LCSW, M.S.W., CGP, Co-Director, Long Island Center for Group Training, Long Island, New York

Advanced Level
10+ years of group psychotherapy experience

Instructors:

11.  Arnold Cohen, Ph.D., CGP, Associate in Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

12.  Lena Furgeri, Ed.D., LCSW, CGP, FAGPA, Private Practice, New York, New York

13.  Dale Godby, Ph.D., ABPP, CGP, Dallas Group Analytic Practice, Dallas, Texas

14.  Joan Medway, Ph.D., LCSW, BCD, CGP, Private Practice, Potomac, Maryland

15.  Joseph (Jev) Sikes, Ph.D., CGP, Private Practice, Austin, Texas

I-B. PROCESS GROUP EXPERIENCE SECTION WITH MIXED LEVELS OF EXPERIENCE

Instructor: Norman Neiberg, Ph.D., PC, CGP, DFAGPA, Private Practice, Newton, Massachusetts

 

I-C. PROCESS GROUP EXPERIENCE SECTION FOR SENIOR THERAPISTS

Limited to prior AGPA Institute instructors or registrants who have participated in four or more AGPA Institutes.

 

Instructors:

1.     Jerome Gans, M.D., CGP, FAGPA, Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

2.     Beatrice Liebenberg, M.S.W., CGP, DFAGPA, Private Practice, Washington, D.C.

 

I-D. TWO-YEAR CONTINUOUS SECTION

Registration for this section assumes attendance at two consecutive Annual Meetings

 

Instructors:

 1.    Bruce Bernstein, Ph. D., ABPP, FAGPA, Private Practice, Great Barrington,

Massachusetts (This is the 1st year of this section).

 2.    Marianne Robinson, M.S.W., CGP, Private Practice, Seattle, Washington

(This is the 2nd year of this 2 year section; New participants will not be  accepted).

 

I-E. THREE-YEAR CONTINUOUS SECTION

Registration for this section assumes attendance at three consecutive Annual Meetings.

 

Instructors:

1.      Bonnie Buchele, Ph.D., ABPP, CGP, DFAGPA, Private Practice, Kansas City, Missouri (This is the 3rd year of this group; New participants will not be accepted).

2.      John Dluhy, M.D., CGP, FAGPA, Clinical Professor, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. (This is the 2nd year of this group; New participants will not be accepted).

3.     Sara Emerson, LICSW, M.S.W., CGP, FAGPA, Private Practice, Cambridge,

Massachusetts (This is the 1st year of this group).

 

 

Process Group Experience Sections – Course References:

  • Aveline, M.O. (1993). Principles of Leadership in Brief Training Groups for Mental Health Care Professionals. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 43:107-129.


  • Gans, J.S., and Alonso, A. (1998). Difficult Patients: Their Construction in Group Psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 48:311-326.

  • Ganzarain, R. (1989). The Group as a Training Base. In R. Ganzarain Object Relations and Group Psychotherapy. (pp. 217-337). New York: International Universities Press.

  • Horwitz, L. (1977). A Group Centered Approach to Group Psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 27:423-439.

  • Kauff, P.F. (1979). Diversity in Analytic Group Psychotherapy: The Relationship between Theoretical Concepts and Technique. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 29:51-56.

  • Kibel, H.D., and Stein, A. (1981). The Group-as-a-Whole Approach: An Appraisal. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 31:409-427.

  • MacKenzie, K.R., Dies, R.R., Coche, E., Rutan, J.S., and Stone, W.N. (1987). An Analysis of AGPA Institute Groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 37:55-74.

  • Pines, M. (1981). The Frame of Reference of Group Psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 31:275 285.

  • Rutan, J.S., Alonso, A., and Groves, J.E. (1988). Understanding Defenses in Group Psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 38:459-472.

  • Rutan, J.S., and Stone, W.N. (1984). Psychodynamic Group Psychotherapy. New York: MacMillan., Press.

  • Swiller, H.I., Lang, E.A., and Halperin, D.A. (1993).  Process Groups for Training Psychiatric Residents. In A, Alonso and H.I. Swiller (Eds.). Group Therapy in Clinical Practice, (pp. 533-545). Washington D.C.: American Psychiatric Press.

  • Wong, N. (1983). Fundamental Psychoanalytic Concepts: Past and Present Understanding of Their Applicability to Group Psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 33:171-191.

  • Yalom, I.D. and Lieberman, M.A. (1971). A Study of Encounter Group Casualties. Archives of General Psychiatry. 25:16-30.
  •  


SPECIFIC INTEREST SECTIONS

 

Section II

The Art of Culture-Building in the Group: An Experiential Journey

 

Instructors:

Frederic Ilfeld, Jr., M.D., CGP, Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada

Barbara Squire-Ilfeld, M.S.N., RNCS, CGP, Private Practice, Olympic Valley, California

 

Utilizing the experiential group process, didactic presentation, and open discussion, the leaders will 1) clarify the concept and mechanism of the group's culture as a paramount therapeutic factor, 2) highlight those cultural elements (shared norms and values) that maximize therapeutic movement, and 3) illustrate techniques for facilitating these therapeutic norms and values.

 

Learning Objectives:

The attendee will be able to:

1. Describe the manner in which cultural norms and values influence the group process.

2. Identify those specific norms and values that best contribute to therapeutic change.

3. Utilize specific therapist techniques that help therapeutic norms and values evolve, thereby contributing to individual change within the group.

 

Course References:

1. Greene, L. (2003). The State of Group Psychotherapy Process Research. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 53, 130-134.

2 .Leszcz, M. (1992). The Interpersonal Approach to Group Psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 42, 37-62.

3. Yalom, I. and Leszcz, M. (1995). The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy. (5th Edition). New York: Basic Books.

 

Section III 

Attachment Theory and Group Psychotherapy

 

Instructor:

Philip Flores, Ph.D., ABPP, CGP, FAGPA, Private Practice, Atlanta, Georgia

 

This section will experientially demonstrate the ways that attachment theory furnishes an effective theoretical formula for informing the delivery of group treatment. Particular attention will be paid to the process of attachment and the inevitable rupture, repair, and reunion that occurs in all healthy, functional and authentic relationships.

 

Learning Objectives:

The attendee will be able to:

1. Demonstrate ways that attachment theory can be applied to group psychotherapy.

2. Define the different styles of attachment (Avoidant, Ambivalent, Disorganized, & Secure) and their relationship to group.

3. Identify the ways that secure base and exploration are intricately connected.

 

Course References:

1. Lewis, T., Amini, F., & Landon, R. (2001). A General Theory of Love. New York: Random House.

2. Flores, P. J. (2004). Addiction as an Attachment Disorder. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Press.

3. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. & Target, M., (2002). Affect Regulation, Mentalization and the Development of the Self. New York: Other Press.

 

Section IV 

Competition for Intimacy: Envy, Jealousy and Enjoyment

 

Instructors:

Leyla Navaro, M.A., Private Practice, Istanbul, Turkey

Steven Van Wagoner, Ph.D., CGP, Private Practice, Washington, D.C.

 

This section will illustrate how men and women struggle for intimacy in groups, including through competition, avoidance, or mutual sharing and enjoyment. Issues of inclusion, exclusion, rejection and consequent vulnerabilities will be worked out. Participants will analyze the various ways of constructing and holding intimacy, attitudes and gender differences in closeness and mutuality, as well as in self-inclusion/exclusion. Competing for intimacy with its potentially destructive by-products like envy and jealousy will be highlighted through mutual feedback during the group process.

 

Learning Objectives:

The attendee will be able to:

1. Distinguish between healthy and destructive aspects of competition in groups.

2. Identify the impact of boundary shifts on competition and intimacy.

3. Identify one's own pattern of approaching and avoiding intimacy in group, including competitive aspects of striving for intimacy.

4. Critically evaluate how men and women differ in the struggle for intimacy, as well as how they are similar.

 

Course References:

1. Doherty, P. et al. (1996). Competition in Women: From Prohibition to Triumph in Women and Group Psychotherapy: Theory and Practice (ed). B. DeChant. New York: The Guilford Press

2. Jordan, J. (1991). The Meaning of Mutuality in Women’s Growth in Connection, 81-97. New York: The Guilford Press.

3. Maguire, M. (1987). Separation and Intimacy: Crucial practice issues in working with women in therapy. Living with the Sphinx: Papers from the women therapy center. London: Women’s Press.

4. Ormont, L. (1988). The Leader's Role in Resolving Resistances to Intimacy in the Group Setting. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 38(1), 29-45

 

Section V

Exploring Gender Issues in Group: Contrasting Female/Male and Combined Experiences

 

Instructors:

Hylene Dublin, M.S.W., LCSW, BCD, CGP, FAGPA, Private Practice, Winnetka, Illinois

Darryl Pure, Ph.D., ABPP, CGP, FAGPA, Associate in Clinical Psychiatry, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois

 

Men and women often approach issues from differing perspectives.  This section will expose participants to a model of single gender groups with the opportunity to experience and examine the dissimilarities between genders.  Subsequently, the groups will be combined providing an opportunity to experience the impact and the capacity for bridging differences.

 

Learning Objectives:

The attendee will be able to:

1. Learn about research and theory regarding men’s and women’s behavior in single-gendered groups.

2. Learn about research and theory regarding men’s and women’s behavior in combined gender groups.

3. Observe similarities and differences in the functioning of men and women in single-gendered groups.

4. Observe the impact on group participation of combining men and women in groups.

 

Course References:

1. Andronico, M. (Ed.) (1996) Men in Groups:  Insights, Interventions, and Psychoeducational Work.  Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

2. Alonso, A. and Rutan, J. (1979). Women in Group Therapy.  International  Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 29: 187.

3.Dublin, H. (in press).  The evolution of the female self:  Attachment, identification, competition, collaboration, and mentoring.  In Navaro, L. & Schwartzberg, S. (Eds.) Contemporary perspectives on jealousy, envy, competition, and gender.  London:  Brunner-Routledge.

4. Reed, B.G. (1983). Women leaders in small groups:  Social-psychological, Psychodynamic and Interactional perspectives.  In Reed, B.G. and Darvin, C.D. (eds.), Social Work with Groups, GroupWork with Women, GroupWork with Men:  An overview of gender issues in social group work practice, p. 153.

 

Section VI

Fire and Ice: The Fate of Love and the Erotic in Group Psychotherapy

 

Instructor:

Allan Elfant, Ph.D., ABPP, CGP, FAGPA,  Private Practice, State College, Pennsylvania

 

The inevitable and enlivening occurrence of love, passion, and sexuality in our psychotherapy groups creates possibilities for personal transformation. However, the experiences of these charged themes also pose risks and dilemmas for the group, its members, and group leaders. Through an experiential format, we will explore these delicate and sensitive issues.

 

Learning Objectives:

The attendee will be able to:

1. Discuss the complicated group tensions that occur when issues of love and the erotic are engaged.

2. Appraise the risks and benefits of experiencing and expressing desire and love in group psychotherapy.

3. Identify and explain the constructive as well as harmful impact of group leader countertransference issues that arise when love and erotic feelings are voiced in our groups.

 

Course References:

1. Benjamin, J. (1995). Like Subjects, Love Objects: Essays on Recognition and Sexual Difference. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

2. Mann, D. (1999). Psychotherapy: An Erotic Relationship: Transference and countertransference passions. New York: Penguin Books.

3. Person, E. (1988). Dreams of Loving and Faithful Encounters: The power of romantic passion. New York: Penguin Books

 

Section VII

Fostering Regression: The Omnipotent Child Takes Center Stage

 

Instructor:

Stewart Aledort, M.D., CGP, Clinical Faculty, Washington Psychoanalytic Society,

Washington, D.C.

 

This institute section will demonstrate, over time, the four major developmental phases of group psychoanalysis that the group and leader must negotiate to organize around an effective, durable analytic culture. The psycho-sexual phase, along with its narcissistic and object related conflicts will be experienced. This model can be applied to once weekly groups.

 

Learning Objectives:

The attendee will be able to:

1. Identify and list the characteristics of the omnipotent child.

2. Identify the power of the passion in the group.

3. Identify the organization through the passion of the bad fit.

 

Course References:

1. Aledort, S. (2002). The Omnipotent Child Syndrome: The role of passionately held bad fits in the formation of identity. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 52,67-89.

2. Aledort, S. (2003). Fleshing out the Omnipotent Child In Group Psychotherapy. Group, 27, 151-169.

3. Mahler, M. (1968). On Human Symbiosis and the Vicissitudes of Individuation. New York: International University Press.

 

Section VIII

Functional Role-Taking: Beyond Survival to Developing and Thriving in Organizations

 

Presented in cooperation with the Systems-Centered

Training and Research Institute

 

Instructor:

Susan Gantt, Ph.D., ABPP, CGP, Assistant Professor in Psychiatry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia

 

Systems-centered training enables a shift from taking one's work roles personally to working them functionally in support of the goals of the context. This section will build a systems-centered context in which to explore the challenges of role flexibility and functional role-taking.

 

Learning Objectives:

The attendee will be able to:

1. Discriminate between functional organizational roles and the ongoing personal role suction to nonfunctional roles.

2. Apply systems-centered thinking to learn to locate oneself in role related to the goal of the context.

3. Identify how to increase one’s capacity for role flexibility.

 

Course References:

1. Agazarian, Y., and Philibossian, B. (1998). A Theory of Living Human Systems as an Approach to Leadership of the Future with Examples of How it Works. In E. Klein, F. Gabelnick & P. Herr (Eds.), The Psychodynamics of Leadership. Madison, CT: Psychosocial Press.

2. Gantt, S. and Agazarian, Y. (2006). SCT in Action. London: Karnac.

3. Carter, F. (2000). Relationships as a Function of Context. In U. McCluskey and C. Hooper (Eds.), Psychodynamic Perspectives on Abuse: The Cost of Fear. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.

 

Section IX

Gender, Sexuality and Shame

 

Instructor:

Steve Cadwell, Ph.D., CGP, Private Practice, Boston, Massachusetts

This is an Institute section is for ALL GENDERS and SEXUAL ORIENTATIONS.  Often our earliest experience within our families and peers polarizes gender and sexuality into simplistic dichotomies:  masculine/feminine, gay/straight.  We feel shame rather than healthy affirmation of our diverse experience.  This section will affirm our diverse experience of sexuality and gender. Affirmation of diversity in group affirms our internal personal complexity as well.
 
Learning Objectives:
The attendee will be able to:
1. Model the leader's crucial role in establishing safety in the group so the group can explore gender role and sexuality.   Tone will be of Affirmative Action:  “Do ask.  Do tell. Do pursue.” The importance of being SEEN and RECOGNIZED will be understood and experienced.
2. Identify resistance and transference to issues of gender role and sexuality: The Closet of split-off and polarized difference, Joining versus Closeting, The closet as safety in trauma, closeting through the objectification of the Other by scapegoating or Outing,  Boundary management: Secrets versus Privacy, Coming out to affirmation and pride in our unruly complexity.
3. Recognize their own countertransference:  our shame, our own polarities, our splitting, scapegoating, dread of being the scapegoat, and more.

Course References:

1. Domenici, T. and Lesser, R. (1995).  Disorienting Sexuality. London, Great Britain: Routledge Press.

2. Benjamin, J. (1988)  The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination.  New York: Pantheon Books.

3. Morrison, A. (1998). The Culture of Shame. New Jersey: Jason Aronson.

4. Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association: whole issue on Examining Gender and Sexuality Fall/ 20O1.  See especially:  Friedman, “Psychoanalysis and Human Sexuality”, Phillips “The Over Stimulation of Everyday Life “ and Moss “ Racism, Homophobia, Misogyny”

 

Section X

Group Development from a Self Psychological and Intersubjectivity Perspective

 

Instructor:

Walter Stone, M.D., CGP, DFAGPA, Professor Emeritus, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio

         

This section will examine the impact of consistent application of Self Psychological and Intersubjectivity principles to members’ experience of group developmental phases. The impact of focusing on forward and trailing edge transferences will be explored as applied to developmental phases and to the selfobject needs of the participants.

 

Learning Objectives:

The attendee will be able to:

1. Appreciate the impact on an empathic stance on group developmental phases.

2. Identify the need for types of selfobject response linked to the phases

3. Distinguish traditional and self psychological views of anger/aggression/assertion

4. Describe the impact of the leader’s “stance” of understanding and explaining

5. Assess the impact of a focus on leading and trailing edge phenomenon

 

Course References:

1. Stone, W. (2001). The Role of the Therapist’s Affect in the Detection of Empathic Failures, Misunderstandings and Injury. Group, 25, 3-14.

2. Livingston, M. (2003). Vulnerability, Affect and Depth in Group Psychotherapy. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 23, 646-677.     

3. Tolpin, M. (2002). Doing Psychoanalysis of Normal Development: Forward Edge Transferences. In: A. Goldberg (Ed).  Postmodern Self Psychology: Progress in Self Psychology, 18, 167-190.

 

Section XI

The Influence of Gender in Culture: A Lacanian View of the Interaction Between Individual and Society

 

Instructor:

Macario Giraldo, Ph.D., CGP, Faculty, Washington School of Psychiatry, Washington, D.C.

 

According to Lacan there is no firm basis for harmony between man and woman. This basic lack of rapport between the sexes brings profound implications for how cultures develop. In this section participants will explore how gender roles interrelate with the individual and the culture. The place of the object in bringing out the reality of gender will be demonstrated.

 

Learning Objectives:

The attendee will be able to:

1. Define the concept of sexuation as it relates to gender and its derivatives.

2. Differentiate the categories of Real, Imaginary and Symbolic and how they relate to gender.

3. Contrast the concept of object as understood in object relations from Lacan’s concept of the object.

4. Apply the definition of the object to the object of desire and its function in gender development.

 

Course References:

1. Verhaegue, P. (1999). Love in a Time of Loneliness: Three essays on drive and desire. New York: Other Press.

2. Giraldo, M. (2001). Chaos and Desire: The simple truth of the unconscious in the psychoanalytic Group. Group Analysis, 34:3, 349-362

3. Ragland, E. (2000). How The Fact That There is No Sexual Relation Leads to Culture. In: The Subject of Lacan. A Lacanian reader for psychologists, 14, 251-263, State University of New York Press.

 

Section XII

Know Thyself

 

Instructor:

Nina Fieldsteel, Ph.D., ABPP, FAGPA, Faculty, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts

 

The recent and increasing interest in the therapist's use of self as an important element in the therapy forces a focus on how we define "self." Is the definition limited to "self" as therapist or does it include multiple aspects of the total person? What are the effects of the definition used on the therapeutic work and on the patient-therapist relationship in particular? This institute section will also consider the questions of boundaries and ethics in this therapeutic approach.

 

Learning Objectives:

The attendee will be able to:

1. Choose how he/she defines "self."

2. Understand how that definition may effect therapeutic work.

3. Make decisions about boundaries in therapist transparency.

4. Determine when such approaches are helpful to patients and when they might not be as useful.

 

Course References:

1. Rubenfeld, S. (2005). Relational Perspectives Regarding Countertransference in Group and Trauma. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 55, (1), 115-136.

2. Pine, F. (2006). If I Knew Then What I Know Now. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23 (1), 1-7.

3. Aron, L. (1996). A Meeting of Minds. Chapters 3 & 8. Hillside, NJ: The Analytic Press.

 

Section XIII

A Modern Analytic Approach to Working with Immediacy

 

Instructor:

Elliot Zeisel, Ph.D., LCSW, CGP, FAGPA, Training Analyst, Supervisor, Center for

Modern Psychoanalytic Studies, New York, New York

 

Working in the Here & Now provides us with a picture of interpersonal experience and a window into the patient's and leader's intrapsychic process. We will explore use of various interventions in the resolution of resistance and examine methods for enhancing the leader's ability to use countertransference reactions to overcome obstacles in himself and in group members.

 

Learning Objectives:

The attendee will be able to:

1. Define the value of working in the Here & Now.

2. Distinguish between thoughts and feelings.

3. Utilize countertransference reactions in formulating interventions.

 

Course References:

1. Ormont, L. (1991). Use of Group in Resolving Subjective Countertransference. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 41: 433-448.

2. Maroda, K. (1991). The Power of Countertransference. Ch. 2 "Motivations for Treatment: The Pursuit of Transformation." England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

3. Spotnitz, H. (1976). Psychotherapy of Preoedipal Conditions. Ch. 31. "Training in the Use of Feelings" New York: Jason Aronson

 

Section XIV

Moral Corruption and Ethical Dilemmas in Professional Life

 

Presented under the auspices of the AGPA Large and Median Group and

Group Analysis SIG

 

Instructors:

Earl Hopper, Ph.D., CGP, FAGPA, Private Practice, London England

Meg Sharpe, BA Hons, M. Inst. GA, Private Practice, London, England

The section will begin with two lectures about trauma in organizations, with special reference to violations of ethical codes, focusing on patterns of aggression, loneliness and personal suffering.  We will invite participants to share their own experiences and dilemmas in these areas of professional life, and may role-play scenarios from our consultancy experience. The ideas of Bion and Foulkes will inform our thinking.

 

Learning Objectives:

The attendee will be able to:

1. Distinguish victimized ‘objects’ trapped in politicized loyalties to colleagues and feelings of hopeless despair, from responsible ‘subjects’ able and willing to exercise the rights and obligations of organizational citizenship.

2. Identify processes of ‘equivalence’ in terms of events, feelings and fantasies that occur in the foundation, dynamic/groups and personal matrices within an organization.

3. Analyze the effects of the personalities of leaders and central persons on the life of organizations, and vice versa, for example, with respect to valence, role suction, personification, on the one hand, and reparative and malignant narcissism on the other, with special reference to the development and maintenance of an ethical culture.

4. Think clearly about the cross-pressures involved in making decisions about ethical obligations in professional organizations.

 

Course References:

1. Hopper, E. (2003). Traumatic Experience in the Unconscious Life of Groups. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

2. Gabbard, G., and Lester, P. (1995). Boundaries and Boundary Violations in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.

3. Kernberg, O. (1991). The Moral Dimensions of Leadership in S. Tuttman (Ed). Psychoanalytic Group Theory and Therapy. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

 

Section XV

Redecision Therapy: Model Short-Term Treatment Approach

 

Instructor:

Michael Andronico, Ph.D., CGP, FAGPA, Private Practice, Somerset, New Jersey

 

Redecision Therapy is an integration of Gestalt, Transactional Analysis, imagery and behavior modification.  This approach enables the therapist to meet the needs of individuals who benefit from long-term therapy while at the same time allowing individuals with limited time and economic resources to do significant work in the group.  This institute section will demonstrate how these approaches can be blended with regressive work in a short-term experiential group process setting.

 

Learning Objectives:

The attendee will be able to:

1.  Identify background of Redecision Therapy.

2.  Utilize issues of group process vs. individual therapy in a group.

3.  Utilize the Chronological Elevator - an explanatory concept of regression and how to apply it in a group setting.

4.  Apply anchoring and how to use it in ending a piece of work.

 

Course References:

1. Goulding, M. and Goulding, R. (1979). Changing Lives Through Redecision Therapy. New York. Grove Press.

2. Gladfelter, J. "Redecision Therapy", International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 42(4).

3. Andronico, M. "The Chronological Elevator:  A Redecision Model for TA and non TA Therapists", In Redecision Therapy: Expanded Perspectives, L. Kadis. (Ed.). 1985, Western Institute for Group and Family Therapy.

 

Section XVI

Story, Symbol & Psyche: A Jungian Approach to Group Psychotherapy

 

Instructor:

Justin Hecht, Ph.D., Clinical Instructor, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California

 

This experiential group psychotherapy institute section will be conducted using a Jungian Analytic Psychology perspective.  The leader and participants work with the archetypes of the dynamic unconscious as they emerge in the group process.   Eclectic techniques will be integrated to foster individuation and interpersonal process.

 

Learning Objectives:

The attendee will be able to:

1. Apply a Jungian orientation to group psychotherapy interventions.

2. Identify archetypal material in personal stories.

3. Describe the characteristics of complexes.

4. Utilize a Jungian approach to the transference to facilitate individuation.

 

Course References:

1. Whitmont, C. Group Therapy and Analytical Psychology.  Journal of Analytical Psychology. (1964).

2. Willeford, W. Group Psychotherapy and Symbol Formation.  Journal of Analytical Psychology, 12, 137-160.

3. Zinkin, L. (1989). The Group’s Search for Wholeness: a Jungian Perspective. Group, 13, 252-264.

 

Section XVII

A Systems-Centered Approach to Groups: Discriminating and Integrating Differences

 

Instructor:

Yvonne Agazarian, Ed.D., CGP, DFAGPA, Founder, Systems-Centered

Training Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

 

In this section, experiential work and review will focus on developing a systems-centered (SCT) group with emphasis on promoting functional subgrouping. This systems-centered technique will enable group members to discriminate and integrate differences rather that stereotyping or scapegoating them.

 

Learning Objectives:

The attendee will be able to:

1. Apply the theory of discriminating and integrating differences through functional subgrouping.

2. Differentiate between experience generated by defenses and primary experience.

3. Select behaviors that contribute to functional subgrouping.

 

Course References:

1. Agazarian, Y. (1997). Systems-Centered Therapy for Groups. New York: Guilford.

2. Bennis, W. and Shepard, H. (1957). A Theory of Group Development. Human Relations, 9(4), 415-437.

3. Brabender, V. (1997). Chaos and Order in the Psychotherapy Group. In F. Masterpasqua and P. Perna (Eds.). The Psychological Meaning of Chaos, Washington: APA.

 

Section XVIII

Under the Microscope: A Continuous Observation Experience

 

Instructors:

Gil Spielberg, M.S.W., Ph.D., CGP, FAGPA, Training and Supervising Analyst, Institute for Contemporary Analysis, Los Angeles, California

Robert Unger, M.S.W., Ph.D., CGP, FAGPA, Faculty, Program Team Leadership, Naropa University/Masters Contemplative Psychotherapy Program, Boulder, Colorado

 

It is well established that points of change, culture building, stages of development and affective regulation take place often un-noticed within the quickly moving and evanescent atmosphere of the therapy group. This Institute section will take advantage of alternating leadership and observation throughout the course of the event, which will allow participants opportunities for concentrated observation and study of these developmental moments.

 

Learning Objectives:

The attendee will be able to:

1.  Identify significant points of change in the group process.

2.  Note significant decision points for the group leader.

3.  Identify characteristic ways members influence the group culture.

4.  Assist other participants in recognizing critical moments of change.

5.  Spot forces that regulate the climate of the group.

 

Course References:

1. Ormont, L. (2000).The Technique of Group Treatment. Furgeri, L. (ed.) Psychosocial Books.

2. Stone, W. and Spielberg, G. (in preparation). Group Development from a Self-Psychological Perspective,

3. Yalom, I. and Leszcz, M. (1985). The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, Basic Books. 3rd. ed.

 

Section XIX