66th
Annual Conference
Saturday,
February 21
Morning
Workshops
9:00
- 11:30
A.M.
Session
77
Integrating Cognitive Behavioral with Psychodramatic Theory &
Practice
Chair:
Thomas
Treadwell, Ed.D., TEP, Professor/Psychologist, West Chester
University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
The GCBT model
promotes dynamic group interaction, experiential participation,
opportunities for catharsis, and basic group psychotherapeutic
techniques. The integration of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
techniques allied to psychodrama provides a balance between
exploration of emotionally laden situations and a concrete,
data-based, problem-solving approach.
experiential-demonstration-sharing of work experiences-didactic
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Educate
participants about the CBT model and the Psychodrama model to create
a safe and secure environment in which individuals can share their
concerns freely.
2. A
problem-solving group approach for working through various
interpersonal, occupational, educational, psychological, and
health-related conflicts.
3. To teach the
group members how to complete a Dysfunctional Thought Record (DTR)
or Automatic Thought Record (ATR).
4. Identifying
automatic thoughts and the meaning of automatic thoughts as they
relate to core-beliefs and/or schemas.
5. Learning how to
develop a self-conceptualization chart reflecting the various rules,
conditional assumptions, beliefs, and means of coping one embraces.
Course References:
1. Treadwell, T.,
Kumar, V.K & Wright, J. (2008). Group cognitive behavioral model:
Integrating cognitive behavioral with psychodramatic theory and
techniques. In
Scott Simon Fehr (Ed.) 101 Interventions In Group
Therapy. New York: The Hayworth Press.
2. Baim, C. (2007)
a Cognitive Psychodramatist?: Reflections on the Links Between
Cognitive Therapy and Psychodrama. British Journal of Psychodrama
and Sociodrama. 22 (2) pp 23-31
3. Fisher, A.J.
(2007). Congenial alliance: Synergies in cognitive and
psychodramatic therapies. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and
the Arts 1, (4), pp. 237–242. |